IronWiFi vs Cisco ISE
Let's be real: you probably don't need everything ISE offers. Here's how we stack up - and where we can save you a small fortune.
Do You Really Need All That?
Look, Cisco ISE is impressive. It's a serious NAC platform with tons of features. But here's the thing - if you're mainly using it for WiFi authentication, you're probably paying for a whole lot of stuff that's just sitting there. We built IronWiFi to give you the WiFi authentication you actually need, without the price tag (or complexity) you don't.
Here's What We've Noticed
A lot of companies set up Cisco ISE for WiFi 802.1X authentication... and never touch the advanced NAC features like posture assessment or pxGrid. Sound familiar? If WiFi auth is what you're really after, switching to IronWiFi could save you $50,000-100,000+ while doing the same job. As of 2026, that gap has only widened with Cisco's latest licensing changes.
How Much Does Cisco ISE Actually Cost?
| Cost Component | IronWiFi | Cisco ISE |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware | $0 (cloud) | $15,000-50,000 |
| Base License | Included | $3-8/endpoint |
| Plus Features | Included | $4-10/endpoint additional |
| Annual Support | Included | 18-20% of license |
| Deployment Time | 30 minutes | 4-12 weeks |
| 1,000 Users Year 1 | ~$2,400 | ~$70,000+ |
| 3-Year TCO | ~$7,200 | ~$100,000+ |
How Do the Features Compare?
| Feature | IronWiFi | Cisco ISE |
|---|---|---|
| 802.1X WiFi Authentication | ✓ | ✓ |
| EAP-TLS / PEAP / TTLS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure AD / Entra ID | ✓ Native | ✓ |
| Active Directory | ✓ | ✓ |
| Okta / Google Workspace | ✓ Native | Limited |
| Captive Portal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Guest WiFi Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| OpenRoaming | ✓ WBA Partner | ✗ |
| Wired NAC | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device Profiling | Basic MAC | ✓ Advanced |
| Posture Assessment | ✗ | ✓ |
| pxGrid Integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cisco Hardware Lock-in | None | Optimized for Cisco |
| Cloud-Native | ✓ | ✗ |
When Does Cisco ISE Make Sense?
- You need both wired and wireless NAC under one roof
- Device posture assessment is a must-have (checking MDM compliance, antivirus status, that kind of thing)
- You're using pxGrid to tie into the broader Cisco security ecosystem
- You need advanced device profiling that goes way beyond MAC addresses
- Your whole network is Cisco and you want everything talking to each other seamlessly
When Is IronWiFi the Better Fit?
- WiFi authentication is what you're really trying to solve
- You need to work with modern identity providers like Okta or Google Workspace
- OpenRoaming or Passpoint is something you're planning for
- You'd rather skip the hardware appliances and ongoing maintenance headaches
- Budget matters (in 2026, we're talking $5/device/month vs $50,000+)
- Your network isn't 100% Cisco - and that's okay
- You want to be up and running in 30 minutes, not 4-12 weeks
So, What's the Bottom Line?
If you need the full NAC experience - wired, wireless, device compliance, the works - Cisco ISE is still a solid choice. But if you're honest with yourself and WiFi authentication is what you actually need, IronWiFi gets you there at 90% less cost, deploys in a fraction of the time, and is way easier to manage. If you're running ISE mainly for WiFi 802.1X with RADIUS, you could be overspending by $50,000+ over the next 3 years. That's real money.
Ready to Give It a Try?
Take IronWiFi for a spin with a 14-day free trial. Works great with Cisco access points and Meraki. No credit card needed - just dive in.
